
OUT NOW — KINDLE EDITION
Why American Support Is Unconditional
Every American president promises change. On Israel, remarkably little changes.
Republican or Democrat. War or peace. Public support or public anger. The relationship survives administrations, scandals, strategic disagreements and profound changes in the Middle East.
WHY?
Israel: The Perfect Colony follows that question through American politics, money, military power, intelligence, history and empire.
Also on Amazon.com
The conventional answers are familiar: shared democratic values, strategic interests, domestic politics, religious ties and a powerful pro-Israel lobby.
Each explains something.
But do they explain the durability of the relationship itself?
Why has support survived presidents who privately clashed with Israeli governments? Why does military and diplomatic support persist through radically different administrations? Why has Israel remained strategically exceptional when America’s interests elsewhere have repeatedly changed?
This book begins with those questions.
How American financial and military support developed, who authorised it, and how it became institutionalised.
Congress, presidents, lobbying, elections and the unusual bipartisan durability of the relationship.
Arms, intelligence, strategic cooperation and the argument that Israel is an indispensable American ally.
How the relationship developed from the creation of Israel through the Cold War and into the modern Middle East.
The institutions, interests and relationships that persist even as governments change.
Whether these apparently separate forces make more sense when viewed as parts of a larger architecture of power.
The book does not use colony simply to mean a territory ruled directly by a foreign power.
It asks whether the concept itself needs updating.
What if the most effective relationship between imperial power and a strategically valuable state does not require governors, occupation or formal ownership?
What if autonomy, prosperity, military strength and technological sophistication can make such a relationship more useful rather than less?
That is the hypothesis the book puts on trial.
The argument of this book is contentious. The underlying record should not be hidden behind the argument.
This bibliography allows readers to examine the government documents, historical records, academic research and other sources on which the book is based — and decide for themselves whether the argument holds.
A note on what this list is not. It is not a claim that every author below agrees with the book’s thesis. Several of them would reject it outright. Mearsheimer and Walt would dispute the central argument; the Israeli state’s own publications are cited as primary evidence, not as endorsement. The list is the evidence base, not a coalition.
The book distinguishes three kinds of claim: documented fact, structural inference, and hypothesis. This list supports the first. Where the book infers, it says so on the page, and no source here should be read as establishing an inference it does not make.
Function is not treated as proof of intention. That something serves a purpose does not establish that it was designed for that purpose, and the book is explicit about where the evidence stops.
Where a source here is contested, that is stated. Where authors disagree with each other or with the book, they are listed anyway.
Last updated: August 2026
The language of geopolitics, finance, diplomacy and military power can obscure as much as it explains.
This glossary provides concise definitions of the institutions, agreements, historical events, political organisations and technical terms used throughout the book.
Some arguments are best examined at the source.
This section brings together key documents, reports, agreements, official records and other primary material referenced in the book.
Where possible, links lead directly to the institution, government body or archive responsible for the original document.
The argument of a book may be fixed at publication. The factual record is not.
Material errors identified after publication will be recorded here transparently, together with any correction made in subsequent editions.
Significant new evidence relevant to the book’s central argument may also be noted here.
If you believe a claim in this book is wrong, write to ryan@drryannoronha.com. Challenges supported by evidence will be answered, and any correction made will be recorded here.
Dr Ryan Noronha works as a consultant psychiatrist with 25 years of experience in the NHS.
His research examines the institutions and financial structures that shape modern societies, from the architecture of central banking and empire to their consequences for everyday life.